How to Write a Literature Review for a Dissertation?
How to Write a Literature Review for a Dissertation?
When writing a literature review, you should keep several things in mind: how to organize your sources, how to synthesize and summarize sources, and what kind of organization to use. Hopefully, by the time you’re finished, you’ll know how to write my literature review for a dissertation. In this article, you’ll learn the basics and get started writing! Once you’ve gathered your sources, you’ll be well on your way to completing this important piece of your dissertation.
Organizing your literature review
There are many ways to organize your literature review for a dissertation. One of the most common approaches is by topic. You can use the term topic to organize your literature review, which makes sense to your reader. Another way to organize is by author or level of support. Organizing by author or level of support can result in a less organized review. Regardless of the organization method, you should make sure to describe the study in detail and reference its source.
Once you have decided to use the term theme, the next step is to organize your literature review by topic. A chronological review, for example, would have a subsection for each period of vital importance. Similarly, a thematic review would have subtopics based on the theme of the study. You’ll also want to include historical and current information about your topic. Organizing your literature review for a dissertation may seem like a daunting task. But there are tips to make it easier for you to get started.
An effective literature review is organized to make the research more understandable. It will highlight scholarly context and define the topic’s central problem. It should also highlight a gap in the literature. Depending on how long your review is, you may want to divide it into subsections, with each sub-section focused on a particular topic, time period, or methodological approach. At the end, you’ll want to summarize the key findings and draw some conclusions.
Keeping sources current
Keeping sources current is a critical aspect of writing a literature review for a dissertation. A literature review must show how a particular study contributed to the existing body of knowledge, using existing theories and methods. In addition to keeping sources current, a literature review should be properly proofread before submission. If you don’t have the time to do this yourself, you can hire a professional proofreader to do the work for you.
Several types of information sources may be necessary for different disciplines. Some fields require different kinds of sources, while others require a single type. Likewise, the necessary information may be available in various formats. Ask the subject librarian for guidance on which sources are appropriate for your topic. By using an organized system, you can organize the sources according to the topic and methodology. When organizing sources by method, you can clearly see how different methodologies have impacted the way that a certain subject is approached.
Besides academic journals, you can include news articles and blogs as well. These sources can serve as a backdrop for your study, or they can show that a particular trend has emerged recently. But, you should not rely on these sources solely for your core arguments. Instead, make sure that your sources are credible and reliable. You can also ask your university or college supervisor for specific guidance on the number of sources that are required.
Keeping sources summarized
In order to make a literature review, it is important to keep the sources summarized. When writing a literature review, you should never use direct quotes from the text. Instead, summarize studies that support your viewpoint or provide background information. Paraphrasing ideas is acceptable but you must be careful not to copy the words of others. The literature review should be critical, coherent, and organized in a systematic manner.
A literature review should be organized in the same way as an essay or a book. When writing a review, students should first prepare a working outline. Group the notes they make from each reference in the appropriate section. Note cards can be used to take notes, citations, annotations, and photoscopied articles can include notes in the margins. Regardless of the method used, it is essential to organize the information in a systematic and logical manner.
Organization can be organized according to theme or methodology. Using a chronological approach will help you focus on trends that have occurred over time. If you are studying economic power in Germany, for example, you can organize the literature review by when the Soviet Union collapsed, and then focus on what happened afterwards. When organizing sources chronologically, you can show changes in scholarly perspective over time, while grouping them by theme will help you see how different methods have impacted the development of your subject.
Keeping sources synthesized
When writing a literature review for a dissertation, keeping sources synthesized is crucial. This step requires students to evaluate all of their sources and choose the most relevant ones. They won’t have time to read all of the available literature on a subject, so it is essential to prioritize your sources and select only the ones that are most relevant to your topic. The last thing you want is to waste time on irrelevant sources.
In addition to keeping sources analyzed and synthesized, you should keep the author’s voice in your review. While weaving references to other sources into your own writing, be sure to end each paragraph with your own ideas. Paraphrasing sources is also important, but use caution when doing so. Paraphrasing should accurately represent the author’s ideas and information, so make sure to include a citation.
When writing a literature review for a dissertation, you must keep the topic centered. The body paragraphs should focus on a specific source of literature, which should be presented in a consistent manner. You may choose to structure your review chronologically, thematically, or methodologically. Chronological structure can present the evolution of a concept over time. You may also choose to group sources according to the topic you are writing about.
Choosing a length
The length of a literature review for a dissertation varies depending on the topic, audience, and discipline. It can range anywhere from a couple of pages to a full chapter that spans twenty or more pages. It should be easy to read, but also have sufficient depth to cover a broad range of topics. A literature review should also be carefully filtered to remove irrelevant publications, especially if the field has hundreds of publications.
A good rule of thumb is to use at least eight pages for a literature review. The length of the review depends on the length of the thesis, but typically a master’s thesis is around 60 pages long and a bachelor’s thesis can be between forty and eighty pages. If you’re unsure of how much content you need to include, consider using a template. You can download a sample of a literature review here.
Using thought maps, you can identify intersections and categories between multiple topics. By highlighting these intersections, you’ll be able to narrow down your choices for the review material. By summarizing key information from several articles, you’ll be better equipped to choose the best articles and books to read. By the end of your literature review, you’ll have a clear picture of the content.
Creating a thematic review vs an annotated bibliography
There are some differences between an annotated bibliography and a thematic review, and you should know which is right for you. An annotation is an evaluation of a source that contributes to the study or argument. It should not only sum up the information found in the source, but it should also clarify the source’s relevance, bias, and purpose. For example, consider the book When the Texans Come by John Philip Wilson. The UNM Press published this book in 2001.
The main difference between an annotated bibliography and a thematic review is the organization. The latter is organized chronologically, while the former is organized thematically. A thematic review is more likely to be more organized and less prone to the temptation to rewrite or summarize the information from different sources. Thematic reviews are also easier to construct as they show readers exactly what types of research sources are relevant to the topic at hand. For example, a literature review on popular music might focus on its production, dissemination, and historical development, as opposed to the more narrowly focused annotated bibliography.
The annotated bibliography, on the other hand, consists of a list of sources that have been cited in the body of work. The annotated bibliography should have a descriptive paragraph at the end, which summarizes the information contained in the source. The annotated bibliography should be presented alphabetically. It is also crucial to note that source summaries are usually around 150 words long, but this can vary depending on the source.
For more information, visit our blogs
OUR FREE SERVICES